Towards the abolition of money
Apr. 12th, 2020 03:23 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
yannisSo, I decided to write down about things that are waiting us in the future.
First of all, as "COVID-19" doesn't exist, creating a vaccine against it is impossible.
So, why are we sitting at home, losing our money, jobs, possibilities, sanity and basically everything? What is all this about, and when will it end?
Well, the bad news is that this will never end, at least here, in EU.
This curfew (aka "quarantine", but whatever) is indefinite and possibly perpetual.
But how are people supposed to live and function in these conditions, when they don't have any rights and freedoms and are constantly losing their money?
Well, pretty simple, indeed: people (and I'm again talking about EU) will get allowance, at first with money, and later, when money will be abolished, with food stamps and guaranteed services.
Why so? - Because the curfew (aka "quarantine") was designed to dry out all personal bank accounts and by depriving people of their money (and also will, possibilities etc) force them to turn to the State.
So it will be the State that will decide who needs what and who should do what, not people themselves.
When all personal money will run out, and all businesses will go bancrupt, people won't be able to buy things they want and to do things they want, and this will be good from the point of view of the State, because people won't be able to harm neither themselves, nor the Nature, nor the State.
People won't be able to buy and drive cars or buy plane tickets or anything like that, so the pollution will decrease significantly.
People will also not be able to buy guns and ammunition to hunt animals or to buy fishing equipment to fish, so animals will be fine too.
People won't be able to buy shoes and clothes they don't need, which, of course, will also have a good impact on Nature, because production which harms the environment will cease to exist.
At last, people won't be able to go to concerts and other cultural/recreational events, or to museums, or to hairdessers, or to restaurants/cafes, or to do other "non-vital" stuff, which will also contribute to the protection of Nature.
I can go on, but I think everybody gets my point now.
So, the only things left will be production and distribution of food and some basic clothing, energy (the consumption of which will fall drastically due to the measures listed above), health service and Science/Technology/Education.
These fields don't need many people and robotization will continue, so, I assume, only about 10-20% of population will be needed to fulfill all the needs, and the further progress will go, the fewer people the State will need.
Since the consumption of energy will fall dramatically, we will be OK with only green energy left, so no more oil, gas, coal or nuclear energy.
Farmers will be left as they are, at least for now, but in the future their work will be automated to the maximum, because the State will be able to assign to this job as many engineers/scientists as it needs, because there will be plenty of engineers/scientists who lost their jobs in other fields (entertainment, vehicle construction, energy etc).
The distribution of food and basic goods will also stay as it is for some time, but later all distributors will be nationalised, so it will be possible to abolish money completely.
When both production and distribution of food and basic goods will completely fall into the State's hands, it will be possible for it to regulate the consumption of said food/goods, so it will be very easy to ban some unwanted/unhealthy products completely, like alcohol, tabacco, meat, junk food etc, so it will be a matter of time when all these things will be banned.
And the State will have a great excuse to do it: since people won't have money anymore, they won't be able to pay for their insurance, and only the State will be able to "pay" for medicine, and so, it the State "pays" for medicine, shouldn't the State decide what is healthy and what is not, and what should people eat or drink? As all the food will be rationed, people will get as many nutrition as they need exactly, and if someone won't like it, he will be able to go to a doctor (nutritionist) and to complain, and if doctor decides a person really needs more nutrition, his ration will be changed accordingly, because, of course, different people will get different rations and diets, depending on their constitution, sex, habits, work they do etc.
As for Science, the State will decide how many scientists in different fields it needs, and Education will function accordingly. There won't be schools anymore, of course, children will study online and then pass tests, those bright and interested enough will continue their studies, and the State won't lose educational resourses on the others; if a person can read and write and count and isn't interested in continuing their study, there is no point to cram information they don't need into their brain.
So, yes, in a few months (and certainly before the end of this year) we, the citizens of EU, will see many interesting things.
The economic model we have right now can't function anymore, if we want to save the Planet, save the Nature, save ourselves, then the abolition of money and the way of life we used to is inevitable.
We'll have to forget about our "rights" and "freedoms" and "will", because if our behavior and our consumption destroys the Nature and the society, then something is certainly should be done about it.
And non-existent "COVID-19" has nothing to do with it, it was just a handy pretext for restructuring society and economy; if there was no "COVID-19", we would have had the same processes running, but explained by "global warming" or whatever.
You just can't call this a normal situation, when a person living in EU can own a few houses, a yacht and a few cars, while a person with the same skills, but living ouside EU, can barely make the ends meet.
This is just not fair and plain wrong, and as we can't give the same amount of wealth to all the other people in the world (because even if we could, this would only lead to the total destruction of the Earth's environment and Nature), we can only deprive of these things ourselves.
While, at the same time, we can't deprive ourselves of everything and leave ourselves to strave to death, so the gradual abolition of money and turning of the State into the only authority is the only way out of this dead end, because if money won't be abolished, this will lead to the total destruction of the Earth's environment and Nature mentioned above (as the wealth of the Western people will grow exponentially) and the continuing surge of people having nothing to lose to EU.
So, yeah, what we, citizens of EU, see now and what we live through is the part of these painful processes, designed by our leaders.
And the logic they are guided by is described above. I don't say I agree with it, but we have what we have. It is visible that the great majority of Europeans supports these processes, so let it be.
First of all, as "COVID-19" doesn't exist, creating a vaccine against it is impossible.
So, why are we sitting at home, losing our money, jobs, possibilities, sanity and basically everything? What is all this about, and when will it end?
Well, the bad news is that this will never end, at least here, in EU.
This curfew (aka "quarantine", but whatever) is indefinite and possibly perpetual.
But how are people supposed to live and function in these conditions, when they don't have any rights and freedoms and are constantly losing their money?
Well, pretty simple, indeed: people (and I'm again talking about EU) will get allowance, at first with money, and later, when money will be abolished, with food stamps and guaranteed services.
Why so? - Because the curfew (aka "quarantine") was designed to dry out all personal bank accounts and by depriving people of their money (and also will, possibilities etc) force them to turn to the State.
So it will be the State that will decide who needs what and who should do what, not people themselves.
When all personal money will run out, and all businesses will go bancrupt, people won't be able to buy things they want and to do things they want, and this will be good from the point of view of the State, because people won't be able to harm neither themselves, nor the Nature, nor the State.
People won't be able to buy and drive cars or buy plane tickets or anything like that, so the pollution will decrease significantly.
People will also not be able to buy guns and ammunition to hunt animals or to buy fishing equipment to fish, so animals will be fine too.
People won't be able to buy shoes and clothes they don't need, which, of course, will also have a good impact on Nature, because production which harms the environment will cease to exist.
At last, people won't be able to go to concerts and other cultural/recreational events, or to museums, or to hairdessers, or to restaurants/cafes, or to do other "non-vital" stuff, which will also contribute to the protection of Nature.
I can go on, but I think everybody gets my point now.
So, the only things left will be production and distribution of food and some basic clothing, energy (the consumption of which will fall drastically due to the measures listed above), health service and Science/Technology/Education.
These fields don't need many people and robotization will continue, so, I assume, only about 10-20% of population will be needed to fulfill all the needs, and the further progress will go, the fewer people the State will need.
Since the consumption of energy will fall dramatically, we will be OK with only green energy left, so no more oil, gas, coal or nuclear energy.
Farmers will be left as they are, at least for now, but in the future their work will be automated to the maximum, because the State will be able to assign to this job as many engineers/scientists as it needs, because there will be plenty of engineers/scientists who lost their jobs in other fields (entertainment, vehicle construction, energy etc).
The distribution of food and basic goods will also stay as it is for some time, but later all distributors will be nationalised, so it will be possible to abolish money completely.
When both production and distribution of food and basic goods will completely fall into the State's hands, it will be possible for it to regulate the consumption of said food/goods, so it will be very easy to ban some unwanted/unhealthy products completely, like alcohol, tabacco, meat, junk food etc, so it will be a matter of time when all these things will be banned.
And the State will have a great excuse to do it: since people won't have money anymore, they won't be able to pay for their insurance, and only the State will be able to "pay" for medicine, and so, it the State "pays" for medicine, shouldn't the State decide what is healthy and what is not, and what should people eat or drink? As all the food will be rationed, people will get as many nutrition as they need exactly, and if someone won't like it, he will be able to go to a doctor (nutritionist) and to complain, and if doctor decides a person really needs more nutrition, his ration will be changed accordingly, because, of course, different people will get different rations and diets, depending on their constitution, sex, habits, work they do etc.
As for Science, the State will decide how many scientists in different fields it needs, and Education will function accordingly. There won't be schools anymore, of course, children will study online and then pass tests, those bright and interested enough will continue their studies, and the State won't lose educational resourses on the others; if a person can read and write and count and isn't interested in continuing their study, there is no point to cram information they don't need into their brain.
So, yes, in a few months (and certainly before the end of this year) we, the citizens of EU, will see many interesting things.
The economic model we have right now can't function anymore, if we want to save the Planet, save the Nature, save ourselves, then the abolition of money and the way of life we used to is inevitable.
We'll have to forget about our "rights" and "freedoms" and "will", because if our behavior and our consumption destroys the Nature and the society, then something is certainly should be done about it.
And non-existent "COVID-19" has nothing to do with it, it was just a handy pretext for restructuring society and economy; if there was no "COVID-19", we would have had the same processes running, but explained by "global warming" or whatever.
You just can't call this a normal situation, when a person living in EU can own a few houses, a yacht and a few cars, while a person with the same skills, but living ouside EU, can barely make the ends meet.
This is just not fair and plain wrong, and as we can't give the same amount of wealth to all the other people in the world (because even if we could, this would only lead to the total destruction of the Earth's environment and Nature), we can only deprive of these things ourselves.
While, at the same time, we can't deprive ourselves of everything and leave ourselves to strave to death, so the gradual abolition of money and turning of the State into the only authority is the only way out of this dead end, because if money won't be abolished, this will lead to the total destruction of the Earth's environment and Nature mentioned above (as the wealth of the Western people will grow exponentially) and the continuing surge of people having nothing to lose to EU.
So, yeah, what we, citizens of EU, see now and what we live through is the part of these painful processes, designed by our leaders.
And the logic they are guided by is described above. I don't say I agree with it, but we have what we have. It is visible that the great majority of Europeans supports these processes, so let it be.
